Fenty Beauty Match Stix Contour,
Amazon Fresh Time Slots,
Portugués Dam Ponce Pr,
Brian Acton Turned Down By Facebook,
Juventus Tv Live Stream,
Introduction To Money And Banking,
Cellophane Basket Bags,
Cray Wanderers Fc Squad,
Fresca Menu Price,
Ucf Soccer Id Camp 2020,
Adobe Docusign Login,
AFL 2020 Fixture Round 2,
Life In Squares Episode 2,
Montreal Manic Fc,
Julian Edelman Story,
Moz Local Pricing,
Nick Clegg Knighthood,
Kitchener Rangers Coo,
Caitlin Thielen Blog,
Net Insight Careers,
City Destruction Games,
When not onstage, you can find him roaming around Southern California shooting film and humming a tune.I loved your article, Josh, and especially the last two paragraphs. (Did it ever really go away?)
The difference between Portra and the Fuji is $3 a roll on B&H right now. In using C200 myself, I’ve found it entirely pleasing with a nice palette and quite acceptable grain for the extra stop it provides over 100 ISO films. If I get a bad shot, its not the film’s fault. While each film has a distinct look with noticeable differences, we do think they both look great and it comes down to personal preferences. We shot, developed and scanned in our lab.
I’m more of a camera enthusiast, and for that, I shoot Fuji C200 more than any other kind of film. It's back. That willingness to explore encouraged by consumer film combined with the unexpected quality of the film itself resulted in some of my best and most personally fulfilling work to date.So in fact cheap film like C200 is simply perfect! One main difference between Fuji’s films and Kodak’s is their colour reproduction. Novice shooters in particular flocked towards these consumer films because of their low price and ubiquity. I agree with you about the disappearance of these cheap consumer colour films. ในสถานการณ์ปัจจุบัน เจ้า Fujicolor C200 ราคาหล่นลงมาอยู่ที่ 92 บาท (มกรา 2561) ขึ้นอันดับมาแซงเจ้าแห่งฟิล์มราคาถูกจาก Kodak Colorplus 200 ไปได้ เฉยเลย I wouldn’t really even call myself a photographer at all. Glad you enjoyed the article. OF course, in my dreams I also want Sony to reintroduce analogue rangefinders -anyone for the Sony Auto S4 or the Sony Hi-Matic?I still lament the discontinuation of Superia 100 and Kodak Gold 100 too. I had never heard of it, plus the name was so common. In comparison to Superia (which I didn’t really like as it was too green) it gave a wonderful nostalgic film glow that I was seeking when first starting out. I could get lots of shots, but those shots wouldn’t be nearly as clean, or characterful, or interesting as if I’d made them on higher-cost film, right?Great article!
Conventional wisdom would dictate that I leave the C200 at home for casual shooting and trust the bigger names for the truly important moments.But that begs the question – why bother shooting second-rate consumer grade film at any time? A reason it is important to me (aside from cost) is that when shooting as many different cameras as I do, its important for me to use a film I am familiar with. I’d bring C200, and only C200, as my film of choice for the trip. And of course Fuji still (for the moment) sell their stuff.Good story and beautiful images. Great shots. This article interested me very much as I still like using my film cameras and regularly use C200, Superia 400 and the “re-branded” Agfa Vista 200.
Since 1976, we have developed literally millions of rolls of film with experienced lab professionals and film enthusiasts.We decided to head down to our local beach and compare an inexpensive roll of $3 Fujicolor 200 and the professional grade $7 roll of Ektar 100 film.
I suppose that’s just a romantic old view, but it works for me, and certainly enhances my experiences in shooting film. I know C200’s imperfections and strengths because of the high volume I can afford to shoot with it. Manufacturers are not in business to lose money through inefficient economies of manufacture. Perfect as it takes away the expectancy of perfect photos and gives back the joy of making photos.That’s not to say there aren’t moments when Portra or Ektar are called for.