The Court’s decisions are the self-rationalizations of a popular culture in rebellion against God and God’s law. Gerald Bostock has had many sleepless nights over the past seven years. When you receive an engagement letter from one of our lawyers, you will be our client and we may exchange information freely.© 2020 DeWitt LLP. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337.
encompasses sexual orientation discrimination.”But regardless, it’s gratifying that all the justices seemed to agree with Justice Gorsuch’s mode of analysis: “When the express terms of a statute give us one answer and the extratextual considerations suggest another, it’s no contest. .
Even if “sex” includes “sexual orientation, “the plaintiffs must also establish one of two other points . All rights reservedPlease click the “OK” button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.Share this post with your network on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and more.One of the best features about our website articles and blog entries is that they are timely—you get up-to-date information on the law as it exists at the time. And, in the process, it has forced all business owners to treat them as such. Jul 13 2018: Response Requested. God made us to be happy. The best way for you to initiate a possible representation is to call DeWitt LLP at 608-255-8891. Moreover, Justice Kavanaugh points out, Gorsuch’s interpretation not only allows all those who would prefer SOGI protections codified into antidiscrimination law to do an end run around the separation of powers, it privileges a “literalist” statutory meaning over an “ordinary” one. . The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. Or alternatively, [2] that the ordinary meaning of ‘discriminate because of sex’ . We all know this and want this, deep down. There’s a reason why the Apostle Paul and Jesus himself quoted this passage when they spoke about marriage and sexuality (Mark 10:6-9; Ephesians 5:31-32). (Due August 13, 2018) Aug 02 2018: Supplemental brief of petitioner Gerald Lynn Bostock filed. In 2015, the Obergefell v. Hodges decision “I’ve remained optimistic throughout my seven-year journey, especially after walking out of the Supreme Court building back in October of last year.”For Bostock, the only surviving plaintiff in the case, it all started in 2013, when he was fired from his job as a child advocate in Clayton County, Georgia, shortly after he joined a gay softball league.“All I wanted from the beginning was to have my day in court,” Bostock told Guthrie. The Bostock Decision: How The U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling on Sexual Orientation and Transgender Discrimination Impacts Wisconsin Employers.
This reality is stated beautifully in the Bible’s second chapter: “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). The downside is that the law changes, but our older entries don't.
. Give us a call instead, for specific and pointed advice for your particular situation. That’s a blatant violation not just of the laws we actually passed in this country, but of humanity’s basic moral sense written on each heart by God himself (Romans 2:14-15).