Clamping force: medium In terms of the AKG k702 and k712, both are problematic for translation, but they are useful in other ways I'm sure. There is only one big downside (which is still a problem with similar looking AKG models) which is the elastic bands loose their elasticity over a few years already. The AKG K701 look almost identical to the K702 and K712 PRO. Only when there is a substantial seal breach one will notice lower bass notes are subdued. Thank you so much for this. I own the K702 and absolutely love it for flat, even frequency response (for the most part). Each had those annoying head band bumps that a lot of people complained about. Frequency Response. The K702 is an open headphone with a dynamic driver. But the drivers are IDENTICAL to both the K701 and K702. Below the frequency response of the K702 (Left, Right)There is a slight but not audible channel imbalance. The AKG K701 look almost identical to the K702 and K712 PRO. Audio Frequency Bandwidth 12-39500 Hz 10-39800 Hz 10 ... 1MORE E1001 Triple Driver, queste AKG K702 con il cavo in sostituzione a quello originale, Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro, FiiO X5 III e FiiO A5. The headphone feels and is quite sturdy. The AKG K702 are slightly better headphones than the AKG K701, but overall are very similar. For the going streetprices (around € 140.-) this is a good and comfortable headphone that can take a beating. The black/dark-blue and chrome accents give it a different look compared to the white K701. : 113dB This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best headphones for your needs, Want to see us review a specific headphones? IEM Graph Comparison Tool (Premium) Headphone Graph Comparison Tool. This headphone is quite comfortable and can be worn for long periods without getting too ‘hot’ on the ears. Cable: 3m terminated in 6.3mm TRS + 3.5mm adapter The AKG K702 and the Beyerdynamic DT 880 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. The effect of this filter is shown below. The Q701 have bumps on the headband and come with an extra 20-foot cable. Around 2kHz there is a little lingering (the small bump in the FR, it seems happy to vibrate at that frequency) but is very low in level. The AKG K702 share the same style and build as the AKG K701 and AKG K712 PRO. Add to that the K702 is an open headphone and that it does not play sufficiently loud from phones/tablets and cheap DAPs makes it obvious this headphone is only really suited for home and studio usage. I found this (look at the top review, by gabrielnorena) where the user owns both the 65th anniversary edition and the K712, their description of the difference sort of matches your frequency response chart above for the k712 vs k702 with … The AKG K712 PRO deliver a great sound for critical listening. These pads aren’t cheap though. Efficiency: 90dB/1mW (103dB/1V) The tonal balance is hardly changed when listening to these headphones with or without glasses. The open back ear cups are large and circular and covered in a suede-like padding that gives the headphones a premium appeal. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the purchased products locally in Montreal, Canada. S.P.L. You need to drive it from a amplifier or source that can provide enough voltage into 62Ω. The AKG K612 is the successor of the K601. IEM Graph Comparison Tool. 'neutral', whereby all the frequencies are reproduced at roughly the same level across the audio spectrum), but after a few days of constantly working with them I became disenchanted because they sounded somewhat veiled … The K7XX is much less bright and sharp sounding and relatively bassier as a result. At the same time, the AKG are more comfortable and have a wider soundstage that's perceived as coming from in front rather than from inside the listener's head. Their advanced 30 mm XXL transducers with patented Varimotion diaphragms deliver a wide dynamic range, increased sensitivity and high sound levels, while their semi-open design provides a solid bass range and extremely clear highs. Usage: Home, Studio The biggest improvement is in the frequency response. I do not use smoothing because some info about sound quality is lost when plots are smoothed. Here you can vote for our next review, Compare graphs from our headphones test results in order to make a clearer and more informed decision, We buy our own products to test. AKG K701. AKG Pro Audio K702 Over-Ear, … AKG K702 = a proper open back, sounds absolutely amazing straight out the box, perhaps a shade lacking in volume level due to the 200mW drivers, the sub bass interferes with the vocals, backing the volume off a little solves that. Close but no cigar. Impedance The 100μs pulse shows the correct amplitude but the pulse on the top of the signal shows overshoot and a quite high second pulse that should not be there. Female vocals are a bit more forward on the DT 880 Pro; sometimes the K7xx places acoustic instruments in front of female vocals, not that this is inherently a bad thing. The incredible soundstage, clarity, and instrument separation makes the AKG an astounding headphone. The large ear cups easily fit around most ears, and the headband design does not put much pressure on the head. Both headsets use identical Varimotion 30mm XXL transducers with a 15Hz-40kHz frequency response, making them sound nearly identical. Be part of the most informed community and take advantage of our advanced tools to find the best product for your needs. The overall sound is ‘open’, dynamic and very ‘forward’ as well as ‘detailed’. The signal doesn’t follow the stimulus in the horizontal plane and quickly drops down. The K702 is not difficult to drive though with its 62Ω impedance. A Frequency Response graph is not in any way an indication of good sound quality. Equipment Forums. When they eventually do graph … Max. Curabitur lobortis January 19, 2016. You can see what products we currently have for sale. ... As for the K702 it is mostly used for mid to high frequency referencing, the bass response is really nonexistent. Related: AKG K701 vs. K702 On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for long listening sessions. Driver size: ø 40mm Bass mids and treble are well balanced, and the well-designed, large and open earcups give these headphones a spacious soundstage. The mids look better as the measured signal looks more like the applied square-wave but does show overshoot and a lot of ringing. voltage: 3.5V The K501 rolls-off a lot sooner though and is really bass-shy where the K702 still can reproduce lower bass notes, albeit at a lower than neutral level. The bright ‘neutral’ signature can be improved by EQ or as described above. The resonances shift in frequency when the ear-driver distance changes. Frequency Response Graph Unfortunately I can’t find a frequency graph for the K612 (at the time of writing) – so I’ve used the K702 and K601 graphs – mainly because it fairly closely matches what I think I’m hearing. Above 1KHz, there is a 3dB/Octave roll-off present, which won't be effective in blocking outside noise. AKG K612. Headphone connector: 3-pin mini XLR Due to their open-back design, these headphones don't offer any isolation below 1KHz. LEARN ABOUT FREQUENCY RESPONSE CONSISTENCY, Be the first to start a discussion about AKG K702. Below the frequency response of the K702 with the filter. The K712 will sound less harsh to most people, but their soundstage isn't as impressive. They purposely don't block any ambient noise, which is not ideal for the level of noise on a busy commute. No cherry-picked units sent by brands. The K702's are reference, open, over-ear studio headphones for precision listening, mixing and mastering. Ultra Cheap Amp for Akg K702 Under 50$ or should I get easier to drive headphones. Hey bloke! Upper treble is 1dB higher in level though. Awesome graphs, thanks for that - Yeah it'd make sense for them to use the new (at the time) pads in some ongoing designs. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. The AKG K702 and the Philips SHP9500 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. The pads are large enough in inner diameter (60mm) and have a nice depth (25mm) so most ears will fit. The step response plot below  (Left, Right)This plot shows the impulse response/clarity is accentuated and peaks out 4dB above the mids. Below the spectrum plot of the K702 (Right channel). Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. The cable isn’t thin, but also not ‘audiophile thick’, and 3m in length and just mildly microphonic. The AKG K240 Studio and K240 MKII use the same drivers and have the same frequency responses. Even in the bass distortion is below 1% which is good for a dynamic driver. Some people will be disappointed this headphone only has a 3-pin mini XLR plug because this headphone cannot be connected to balanced amplifiers. The K702 is very similar to the K701 with the only real differences being the color scheme, the replaceable cable and the slightly angled pads which the K701 doesn’t have. A guide to reading frequency response graphs of headphones and IEMs. Drum hits etc. (lots of) hair between the headphone and ear or an ear shape that does not allow a proper seal will affect the tonal balance. The K702 has been around for many years already, just like the DT880 and HD650 and have been surpassed as ‘TOTL’ headphones for these brands but still are good performers. The AKG K7XX (red) is a Drop only product. Again, this can be seen on frequency response graphs for all of the AKG K7** series headphones, and it manifests in the sound occasionally. Collapsible: no By contrast, the K712s are much smoother through this frequency region and, as a consequence, are more revealing of detail in the mix. (website links), Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 1) – General Setup, Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 2) – Playing DSD – New SACD plugin (0.9.x and 1.x.x Series), power, efficiency, levels, balanced, impedance. The 5dB ‘dip’ around kHz is audible and makes the K712 sound a bit less ‘edgy’ / ‘forward’. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. It sounds a bit too bright and can have a shrill ‘edge’ with some music. Published: Feb-3-2020, updated: Aug-8-2020. The Philips are also more comfortable for long listening sessions, although the AKG feel more durable. The distortion is quite low. It powered my old AKG K500 enough to even give it some more slam in the low-end. Gain early access to all tests results for new products, Prices will now be listed directly in reviews and tables, Have 5 votes per product category to choose which product we’ll review next, Gain unlimited access to detailed test results in tools and results (no blurred results), Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds For Running, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $200, Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Under $50, Best Noise Cancelling Earbuds And In-Ears, Best Wireless Bluetooth Headphones Under $100, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $100, Video: The 3 Best Gaming Headsets For PS5 (2021), Wyze Noise-Cancelling Headphones Wireless Test Results, EPOS GTW 270 Hybrid Truly Wireless Review, Having trouble deciding between two headphones? Forums. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. It's been a love and hate relationship with my AKG K702 until I stumbled upon your post. This creates a decent seal which slowly conforms to the head over the years. admin. The cable has a 3-pin mini XLR on the headphone side and a goldplated 3.5mm TRS with a gold plated screw-on 6.3mm adapter. Demo units courtesy of: Frequency Response measurements and graphs for In-Ear Monitors (IEMs) and earphones. It is an open headphone with a detachable cable, slightly slanted pads and a different color scheme. These headphones are not designed for everyday, casual use. Below the K702 vs the K501.The K501 is an oldie. This makes the bass sound ‘light’ but ‘tight’. Both units extend well beyond what the typical adult ear is able to perceive, so a more palpable difference is in weight. The mids from 200Hz to 1kHz are pretty flat and make the mids sound ‘neutral’. When they eventually do graph the 612 I’ll update the chart. When you look at the two versions of the graphs at headphone.com here is the result: 20Hz -> 20kHz low end peak/bottom - high end peak/bottom difference: k702 Default version: 6dB Raw version: 20dB k712 Default version: 14dB They elastic bands be replaced but is expensive and not easy to DIY. Below the distortion measurements of the K702 (Right channel)Below the same distortion plot but with the vertical scale in percentages instead of level differences. There still is a resonance which the filter can not remove. They have two-tone navy blue and silver color scheme and an old-school retro design that will work for some. The AKG K702 is a sturdy work horse. Bass is light but is ‘tight’ and well textured. However, the AKG are well-built but don’t feel as durable since they don’t have a full metal frame like the Beyerdynamic. Hello world! Isolation: low (open headphone) The AKG K240 Studio over-ear, semi-open headphones are designed for professional applications such as mixing, mastering and playback. The only real longevity issue is the elastic bands that aren’t easily replaced by owners. Most measurement sites have some smoothing applied which ‘irons flat’ sharp peaks and ‘wiggles’. These are potential weak points where the headphones could get damaged through wear and tear. Frequency response graphs are your friend here. The flatter the frequency response – … But if the process is similar to the physical way of frequency reflections of studio monitor speakers in the room (bass frequency waves remain longer in the room than higher frequency waves), then the AKG K702 could bring a fairly flat sound reproduction to the sensory celly in your ears. While the Sennheiser have slightly less low-bass than the AKG, they have a better-balanced treble range and are more stable on the head. There is hardly any difference. Sound-wise, the AKG might lack a bit of sub-bass when compared to the Beyerdynamic and could sound a bit sharper on higher frequencies. IMPROVED SOUNDSTAGE & RESPONSE Tweaked to deliver an extended frequency response and a wide locationally specific soundstage these headphones put you closer to your music than ever before INSPIRED BY A LEGEND Based on the AKG K702 65th-anniversary-edition headphone this rendition features the same dynamic driver technology and superior build quality—plus a few … ... Not joking. Poor isolaton. To test this the headphone is measured via a low impedance amplifier (0.2Ω) and a high impedance amplifier (120Ω). We’ll get into that in a bit. ALL measurements are made with a good SEAL on a flatbed measurement rig. The AKG K702 share the same style and build as the AKG K701 and AKG K712 PRO. The lower frequencies are quite well damped and ‘stop’ fast. The roll-off in the leakage above 4KHz is rather uncharacteristic of most open headphones. Some experiments were done on the K701 and will be the same for the K702. In-Ear Fidelity is supported by the following: Support those who support us! I had one and I stumbled on it by accident/luck. Comparison Tools. AKG Pro Audio K702 is an open-back and over-ear headphone. As the seal of a headphone is of importance some experiments are done to see the effect. They have two-tone navy blue and silver color scheme and an old-school retro design that will work for some. The AKG K702 like the AKG K712 PRO are big and bulky headphones that are not portable. What’s clearly visible is that AKG stuck to the AKG house sound over all the years. frequency response graphs, … They're best used for critical listening in private. Bass extension isn’t great and it starts to audibly roll-off from 100Hz down. Their open design doesn't block any noise and leaks enough to be distracting. Most people won’t hear a difference between those two models. Each had those annoying head band bumps that a lot of people complained about. The K371 has titanium-coated drivers and a greater frequency response extending from 5Hz-40kHz compared to the K361's 15Hz-28kHz frequency response. The open-back ear cups are well padded and covered in a suede-like fabric that gives the headphones a more premium appeal. Pads: replaceable, velour cloth, 5° angle ... the pads on my K702 are squished to hell. Beyond 1ms the signal drops gradually and shows the bass roll-off. Another small difference is that Q701 comes with a Quincy Jones line logo on the earcups that close the cups, but that doesn't seem to make any noticeable difference in our measurements. It is available in black with very dark blue and matte aluminium accents. With some music there is sibilance. power rating: 0.2W (200mW) The headphone is light in weight. The Sennheiser HD 600 and the AKG K702 are both open-back, over-ear headphones that are similarly suited for critical listening. Type: On-ear, open Impedance: 65Ω A Commenter. AKG K702 - With the K702, AKG adds a studio headphone heavyweight to its portfolio, with precise sound reproduction for mixing and mastering applications. Frequency Response Graph Unfortunately I can’t find a frequency graph for the K612 (at the time of writing) – so I’ve used the K702 and K601 graphs – mainly because it fairly closely matches what I think I’m hearing. We’ll get into that in a bit. Below the square-wave response of the K702. Sound-wise, the AKG might lack a bit of sub-bass when compared to the Beyerdynamic and could sound a bit sharper on higher frequencies. On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for … The elevated upper mids and treble that is responsible for the bright character can be lowered to normal levels using a passive electronic filter. so that you can compare the results easily. Frequency response (tonal balance) is the most sound-determining aspect of headphones. In order to get an idea of the headphones you're most likely to enjoy, it's important to also understand how different frequency response ranges impact sound signature. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. Also going to consider putting some K702 pads on there, ... i.e. It can also be used for the K612 and K701. The small ‘bump’ around 2kHz makes the mids sound a bit too ‘forward’ but not in an annoying way. Immediately after unpacking this device, it’s easy to appreciate the aesthetics. (Left and Right are superimposed) The narrow treble peaks (7kHz, 12kHz and 16kHz) are resonances. Colour: white or black A ‘horizontal‘ frequency response curve on the shown frequency response plots on this website thus indicates a perceived ‘flat’ tonal signature. Recent Comment. The K702 is also a fantastic purchase, and has a bit of a different sound signature. Weight: 235 g. Above 18kHz the response drops off quickly but still shows response at least up to 30kHz. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. And by Over-ear, It means that the earcups of this headphone cover the whole ears of the users. The AKG 702 are very comfortable headphones. Inner pad dimensions: Ø 60mm , depth front: 20mm, depth rear: 25mm AKG K702. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. These headphones are not tight enough and will easily fall your head if used while running. The filtered K702 (the right plots) show the overshoot is removed but there still is a second pulse. They have the same retro design with large circular ear cups and a headband with a self-adjusting strap. Enjoy music through headphones on a low budget, Subjectivist, Objectivist or Inbetweenivist ? Above 10kHz the resonances are visible but are also short. put them under the same test bench, As the foam in pads has a tendency to get softer (more compliant/squishy) over time this will affect the tonal balance. Excellent sound quality for neutral listening. AKG Pro K702 has a frequency response of 10 Hz to 39,800 Hz. October 8, 2016. The AKG K712 Pro is a direct descendent of the classic K701, using a very similar physical design, ... as seen in the frequency response graph. Build quality is decent for the AKG K702. Pinna gain ‘fills-in’ the gap for the largest portion. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. As the K702 is not a high efficiency headphone this too suggests it is not designed for portable usage. © 2021 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved. The jagged response above 5kHz makes the treble a bit ‘coarse’. Quand on passe de l’un à l’autre la première sensation est que le AKG … AKG K702. They have the same retro design with large circular ear cups and a headband with a self-adjusting strap. This plot looks quite good below 500Hz. The treble response is a bit ‘jagged’ and has a typical ‘AKG signature’. Too unstable and cumbersome for use while doing any strenuous physical activity. The AKG are also a bit more open-sounding, and they come with a very long and detachable cable while the Beyerdynamic have a short, coiled cable. In keeping with tradition, AKG’s fixed-length headband is the first showcase of this design philosophy. They're super comfortable headphones with a few more accessories than the K701 or the K702.However, like the previous models, they're a bit bulky and cumbersome for everyday use. and the same isolation level as K701. Frequency response range – Most of the headphones will have at least 20Hz – 20,000Hz (5Hz – 20kHz) frequency response range. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. They're not designed for sports and only stay in place during casual listening sessions. Stock K702 vs filtered K702. I sent an email to AKG asking if the design had been modified in order to make it more appealing to the larger numbers of audiophiles at the expense of the relatively small number of recording studio enthusiasts. Driver type: dynamic I've read it's bassier than the Q701. The AKG K702 is a modernised K701. Their frequency response balance is … The AKG K702 has a ‘bright’ tonal balance similar to the K701. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. This also points toward less refined treble. Some headphones will go as wide as 5Hz – 40,000Hz, however from 20,000Hz additional range doesn’t matter much, because we can’t hear those frequencies anyway. As the pads remain firm for quite a long time the change will go unnoticed I reckon. A give away for the left cup is the cable entry as well. Back to Graph Database. This is described HERE in more detail. Ramblings. But at least the bass is more pronounced and the efficiency is about 4dB higher and fulle sounding.